You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The image properties in the table in Section 9.1.2 are documented to be at Level 1. Since their containing box is ipco and ipco is at Level 2, I think all the image properties should be at Level 3.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Leo: Perhaps the levels in the table in Section 9.1.2 are unrelated to the levels in the table in Section 9.1.1?
I guess the levels in the table in Section 9.1.1 are the levels in the file, whereas the levels in the table in Section 9.1.1 are the levels in the containing box (meta or ipco)?
I guess the levels in the table in Section 9.1.1 are the levels in the file, whereas the levels in the table in Section 9.1.1 are the levels in the containing box (meta or ipco)?
Yes, I think that is what @cconcolato was going for. I think the current structure works, but is slightly confusing. Alternatives that I can think of:
Change the table to look like the one in 9.1.1. We could then remove the "Containing box" column.
Remove the levels from the columns and always state the containing box in the "Containing box" column.
Leo,
The image properties in the table in Section 9.1.2 are documented to be at Level 1. Since their containing box is
ipco
andipco
is at Level 2, I think all the image properties should be at Level 3.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: