Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Prototype nanobind bindings for Imath #433

Open
cary-ilm opened this issue Sep 5, 2024 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #439
Open

Prototype nanobind bindings for Imath #433

cary-ilm opened this issue Sep 5, 2024 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #439
Labels
good first issue Good for newcomers help wanted Extra attention is needed

Comments

@cary-ilm
Copy link
Member

cary-ilm commented Sep 5, 2024

We have the long term goal of removing the dependency on Boost.Python, and the current strategy is to rewrite the bindings with pybind11, although nanobind promises to be even better than pybind11, and also claims to be largely API-compatible.

We should prototype bindings using nanobind. This would involve duplicating the current state of the pybind11 bindings, both source and CMake configuration, and replacing both to use nanobind.

@cary-ilm cary-ilm added good first issue Good for newcomers help wanted Extra attention is needed labels Sep 5, 2024
@mnxn
Copy link

mnxn commented Sep 20, 2024

I'll take a shot at implementing this for Dev Days next week.

@mnxn mnxn linked a pull request Sep 27, 2024 that will close this issue
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
good first issue Good for newcomers help wanted Extra attention is needed
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants