You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In the default config file, you used checkpoint "dpt_hybrid-midas", but why did you use the scale and shift value of checkpoint "dpt_hybrid-nyu" for preprocessing?
I think the initial values of DPT depth affects the performance.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi, thanks for your interest and thanks for identifying this problem.
For the DPT model, we simply took the first model provided in their code and use a set of parameters they provided that can recover depth. It could probably be better if you use the corresponding fine-tuned checkpoint instead. You can also try other depth estimations as long as the depths are in reasonable scales within the sampling range.
Hi, thank you for code release
In the default config file, you used checkpoint "dpt_hybrid-midas", but why did you use the scale and shift value of checkpoint "dpt_hybrid-nyu" for preprocessing?
I think the initial values of DPT depth affects the performance.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: