Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Not being able to express ignore => [atom()], in the options, is hindering #248

Open
elbrujohalcon opened this issue Apr 29, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

Not being able to express ignore => [atom()], in the options, is hindering #248

elbrujohalcon opened this issue Apr 29, 2021 · 1 comment
Milestone
1.2.1

Comments

@elbrujohalcon
Copy link
Collaborator

@paulo-ferraz-oliveira said…

On a more serious note I find that not being able to express ignore => [atom()], in the options, is hindering. I had to do "src/module.erl" (didn't check without the src).

He was talking about rebar.config's format section.

Originally posted by @paulo-ferraz-oliveira in #247 (comment)
@elbrujohalcon elbrujohalcon added this to the 1.1.0 milestone Apr 29, 2021
@elbrujohalcon elbrujohalcon mentioned this issue Apr 29, 2021
Closed
@paulo-ferraz-oliveira
Copy link
Contributor

paulo-ferraz-oliveira commented Apr 29, 2021 •
edited
Loading

Nice :) Thanks. (we take advantage of the fact that module names can repeat, but I'll still use it for .app.src and rebar.config 😄).

@elbrujohalcon elbrujohalcon modified the milestones: 1.1.0, 1.1.1 Apr 11, 2022
@elbrujohalcon elbrujohalcon modified the milestones: 1.1.1, 1.1.2 May 24, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
1.2.1
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@elbrujohalcon @paulo-ferraz-oliveira