You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The current license headers are either outdated or missing completely.
While updating those, it would also be wise to discuss who should be in said license headers. Should we use one for com.almightyalpaca and another one for com.kantenkugel? Or just a combined one for both packages?
Additionally, due to me having my preferred code style placing { on same line, and IJ sometimes not remembering that I set a project-specific code style, some files have brackets placed on same line (sorry).
Considering updating the license headers will change most if not all files anyway, this would be the perfect time to also change the code style to use uniform bracket placement (I'd go with next-line bracket, like used by most of com.almightyalpaca's code already)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The current license headers are either outdated or missing completely.
While updating those, it would also be wise to discuss who should be in said license headers. Should we use one for
com.almightyalpaca
and another one forcom.kantenkugel
? Or just a combined one for both packages?Additionally, due to me having my preferred code style placing
{
on same line, and IJ sometimes not remembering that I set a project-specific code style, some files have brackets placed on same line (sorry).Considering updating the license headers will change most if not all files anyway, this would be the perfect time to also change the code style to use uniform bracket placement (I'd go with next-line bracket, like used by most of
com.almightyalpaca
's code already)The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: