New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Utilisation de propriétés plus précises pour lier RecordResource et Instantiation #60

Open

tfrancart opened this issue Oct 1, 2024 · 1 comment

Labels

Milestone

V3 - Update to Ri...

Collaborator

tfrancart commented Oct 1, 2024

Actuellement : hasInstantiation
On voudrait hasOrHadAnalogueInstantiation ou hasorHadDigitalInstantiation

en fonction de la présention de dao ou daoGroup : alors c'est forcément digital
autres cas : instruments de recherche qui décrivent des archives nativement numériques; on ne sait pas si on peut détecter ces cas

The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:

tfrancart added the enhancement label

tfrancart added this to the rico-converter V3 milestone

Collaborator Author

tfrancart commented Oct 29, 2024

tester sur les dao ou daoGroup et changer en hasOrHadDigitalInstantiation
tester physfacet[@type = 'd3nd9y3c6o-iu0j3xsmoisx' ]alors c'est hasOrHadDigitalInstantiation
Sinon la propriété de base devient rico:hasOrHadInstantiation

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment