You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Not sure if this is a feature already or not, but I wasn't able to see it through the phone website. I tried also viewing the website as a desktop website, but couldn't find this feature.
This tool is helping me a lot with understanding openings. Many studies (for good reason) leave out the reasoning between steps that the studier should figure out themselves. I would like to keep my notes on made studies to helpe review how I was thinking about the position last time I looked at it.
This could be accomplished either by
Allowing me to fork (like github) the study and add my own notes and lines onto it.
Annotate the study with my reasoning for moves not explained.
I think (1) is more helpful because I'd like to add my own lines the study points out but doesn't explore. (2) does not support that capability.
Let me know if this is already a feature. If it isn't, and no one has bandwidth to implement it, let me know the complexity of making this work. If it's not too difficult I can help out.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Not sure if this is a feature already or not, but I wasn't able to see it through the phone website. I tried also viewing the website as a desktop website, but couldn't find this feature.
This tool is helping me a lot with understanding openings. Many studies (for good reason) leave out the reasoning between steps that the studier should figure out themselves. I would like to keep my notes on made studies to helpe review how I was thinking about the position last time I looked at it.
This could be accomplished either by
I think (1) is more helpful because I'd like to add my own lines the study points out but doesn't explore. (2) does not support that capability.
Let me know if this is already a feature. If it isn't, and no one has bandwidth to implement it, let me know the complexity of making this work. If it's not too difficult I can help out.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: