Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Background's design.ini should allow to over ride bg/overlay pairs #642

Closed
Crystalwarrior opened this issue Feb 13, 2022 · 1 comment · Fixed by #665
Closed

Background's design.ini should allow to over ride bg/overlay pairs #642

Crystalwarrior opened this issue Feb 13, 2022 · 1 comment · Fixed by #665
Assignees
Labels
enhancement Request for functionality not present

Comments

@Crystalwarrior
Copy link
Contributor

Crystalwarrior commented Feb 13, 2022

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
If you have a bg folder with a lot of bgs, and you want each bg to have a simple darkness overlay, the current method is to copy-paste the same image across all the pos. This is incredibly tedious and file size inefficient.

Describe the solution you'd like
In design.ini (which we already have due to scaling support) you should be able to define bg_name = overlay_name path. The _overlay naming convention does not have to be respected.

Describe alternatives you've considered
The only viable alternative is copy pasting the same bg over and over. Witness testimony indicator is an option, but it relies on everyone having the same theme.

@oldmud0
Copy link
Member

oldmud0 commented Feb 14, 2022

So

[Overlays]
bg_name = overlay_name

Okay can get behind this

@oldmud0 oldmud0 added the enhancement Request for functionality not present label Feb 14, 2022
@Crystalwarrior Crystalwarrior added this to the 2.10 milestone Feb 15, 2022
@in1tiate in1tiate self-assigned this Feb 17, 2022
@Crystalwarrior Crystalwarrior changed the title background.ini should allow to over ride bg/overlay pairs Background's design.ini should allow to over ride bg/overlay pairs Feb 18, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement Request for functionality not present
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants