You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Specially, I was looking for split the application layer from the (OS and HW) target and using this repository, it will create a direct dependency of FreeRTOS.
I understand there may be helpfully code here, but on this case it could be useful for other targets than FreeRTOS too.
Smaller memory footprint. Full control over memory allocation (this library is non-allocating). I find it has lower latency and faster connect times than sdk-for-c, but this is based on that repo.
Is there an existing issue for this?
Version
main
Description of the issue
I'm evaluating to using this repository over https://github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-for-c to be used on ESP32.
I read the https://github.com/Azure/azure-iot-middleware-freertos/blob/main/docs/azure_iot_c_sdk_port.md
However it is still not clear that would be the benefits.
Specially, I was looking for split the application layer from the (OS and HW) target and using this repository, it will create a direct dependency of FreeRTOS.
I understand there may be helpfully code here, but on this case it could be useful for other targets than FreeRTOS too.
Looking at https://github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-for-c sample, they look simpler and only need to wrap MQTT functions.
What should I consider while using this repository or azure-sdk-for-c ?
Related: #324
Expected behavior
No response
Steps to reproduce the issue
No response
Relevant log output
No response
Code of Conduct
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: