Network (2020-05-01): Error removing/updating load balancer rules #10104

magodo · 2020-07-13T03:26:02Z

When using 2020-05-01 network API, when I want to remove a load balancer rule that the load balancer is attached to VMSS, the request will fail.

The complete flow is as below:

GET https://management.azure.com/subscriptions/0-0-0-0/resourceGroups/test-hbtest/providers/Microsoft.Network/loadBalancers/hbtest1?api-version=2020-05-01 HTTP/2.0

{
  "name": "hbtest1",
  "id": "/subscriptions/0-0-0-0/resourceGroups/test-hbtest/providers/Microsoft.Network/loadBalancers/hbtest1",
  "etag": "W/\"1867ac9a-5eca-431f-831c-939768a65794\"",
  "type": "Microsoft.Network/loadBalancers",
  "location": "eastus2",
  "tags": {},
  "properties": {
    "provisioningState": "Succeeded",
    "resourceGuid": "bf36d61a-728d-4255-8292-4397720a279d",
    "frontendIPConfigurations": [
      {
        "name": "hbtest1",
        "id": "/subscriptions/0-0-0-0/resourceGroups/test-hbtest/providers/Microsoft.Network/loadBalancers/hbtest1/frontendIPConfigurations/hbtest1",
        "etag": "W/\"1867ac9a-5eca-431f-831c-939768a65794\"",
        "type": "Microsoft.Network/loadBalancers/frontendIPConfigurations",
        "properties": {
          "provisioningState": "Succeeded",
          "privateIPAddress": "10.0.1.4",
          "privateIPAllocationMethod": "Dynamic",
          "subnet": {
            "id": "/subscriptions/0-0-0-0/resourceGroups/test-hbtest/providers/Microsoft.Network/virtualNetworks/acceptanceTestVirtualNetwork1/subnets/testsubnet"
          },
          "loadBalancingRules": [
            {
              "id": "/subscriptions/0-0-0-0/resourceGroups/test-hbtest/providers/Microsoft.Network/loadBalancers/hbtest1/loadBalancingRules/rule1"
            }
          ],
          "privateIPAddressVersion": "IPv4"
        }
      }
    ],
    "backendAddressPools": [
      {
        "name": "hbtest1",
        "id": "/subscriptions/0-0-0-0/resourceGroups/test-hbtest/providers/Microsoft.Network/loadBalancers/hbtest1/backendAddressPools/hbtest1",
        "etag": "W/\"1867ac9a-5eca-431f-831c-939768a65794\"",
        "properties": {
          "provisioningState": "Succeeded",
          "loadBalancerBackendAddresses": [
            {
              "name": "test-hbtest_hbtest1_virtualMachines_1_networkInterfaces_primaryprimary",
              "id": "/subscriptions/0-0-0-0/resourceGroups/test-hbtest/providers/Microsoft.Network/loadBalancers/hbtest1/backendAddressPools/hbtest1/loadBalancerBackendAddresses/test-hbtest_hbtest1_virtualMachines_1_networkInterfaces_primaryprimary",
              "etag": "W/\"1867ac9a-5eca-431f-831c-939768a65794\"",
              "properties": {
                "provisioningState": "Succeeded",
                "networkInterfaceIPConfiguration": {
                  "id": "/subscriptions/0-0-0-0/resourceGroups/test-hbtest/providers/Microsoft.Compute/virtualMachineScaleSets/hbtest1/virtualMachines/1/networkInterfaces/primary/ipConfigurations/primary"
                }
              },
              "type": "Microsoft.Network/loadBalancers/backendAddressPools/loadBalancerBackendAddresses"
            },
            {
              "name": "test-hbtest_hbtest1_virtualMachines_2_networkInterfaces_primaryprimary",
              "id": "/subscriptions/0-0-0-0/resourceGroups/test-hbtest/providers/Microsoft.Network/loadBalancers/hbtest1/backendAddressPools/hbtest1/loadBalancerBackendAddresses/test-hbtest_hbtest1_virtualMachines_2_networkInterfaces_primaryprimary",
              "etag": "W/\"1867ac9a-5eca-431f-831c-939768a65794\"",
              "properties": {
                "provisioningState": "Succeeded",
                "networkInterfaceIPConfiguration": {
                  "id": "/subscriptions/0-0-0-0/resourceGroups/test-hbtest/providers/Microsoft.Compute/virtualMachineScaleSets/hbtest1/virtualMachines/2/networkInterfaces/primary/ipConfigurations/primary"
                }
              },
              "type": "Microsoft.Network/loadBalancers/backendAddressPools/loadBalancerBackendAddresses"
            },
            {
              "name": "test-hbtest_hbtest1_virtualMachines_0_networkInterfaces_primaryprimary",
              "id": "/subscriptions/0-0-0-0/resourceGroups/test-hbtest/providers/Microsoft.Network/loadBalancers/hbtest1/backendAddressPools/hbtest1/loadBalancerBackendAddresses/test-hbtest_hbtest1_virtualMachines_0_networkInterfaces_primaryprimary",
              "etag": "W/\"1867ac9a-5eca-431f-831c-939768a65794\"",
              "properties": {
                "provisioningState": "Succeeded",
                "networkInterfaceIPConfiguration": {
                  "id": "/subscriptions/0-0-0-0/resourceGroups/test-hbtest/providers/Microsoft.Compute/virtualMachineScaleSets/hbtest1/virtualMachines/0/networkInterfaces/primary/ipConfigurations/primary"
                }
              },
              "type": "Microsoft.Network/loadBalancers/backendAddressPools/loadBalancerBackendAddresses"
            }
          ],
          "backendIPConfigurations": [
            {
              "id": "/subscriptions/0-0-0-0/resourceGroups/test-hbtest/providers/Microsoft.Compute/virtualMachineScaleSets/hbtest1/virtualMachines/1/networkInterfaces/primary/ipConfigurations/primary"
            },
            {
              "id": "/subscriptions/0-0-0-0/resourceGroups/test-hbtest/providers/Microsoft.Compute/virtualMachineScaleSets/hbtest1/virtualMachines/2/networkInterfaces/primary/ipConfigurations/primary"
            },
            {
              "id": "/subscriptions/0-0-0-0/resourceGroups/test-hbtest/providers/Microsoft.Compute/virtualMachineScaleSets/hbtest1/virtualMachines/0/networkInterfaces/primary/ipConfigurations/primary"
            }
          ],
          "loadBalancingRules": [
            {
              "id": "/subscriptions/0-0-0-0/resourceGroups/test-hbtest/providers/Microsoft.Network/loadBalancers/hbtest1/loadBalancingRules/rule1"
            }
          ]
        },
        "type": "Microsoft.Network/loadBalancers/backendAddressPools"
      }
    ],
    "loadBalancingRules": [
      {
        "name": "rule1",
        "id": "/subscriptions/0-0-0-0/resourceGroups/test-hbtest/providers/Microsoft.Network/loadBalancers/hbtest1/loadBalancingRules/rule1",
        "etag": "W/\"1867ac9a-5eca-431f-831c-939768a65794\"",
        "type": "Microsoft.Network/loadBalancers/loadBalancingRules",
        "properties": {
          "provisioningState": "Succeeded",
          "frontendIPConfiguration": {
            "id": "/subscriptions/0-0-0-0/resourceGroups/test-hbtest/providers/Microsoft.Network/loadBalancers/hbtest1/frontendIPConfigurations/hbtest1"
          },
          "frontendPort": 5000,
          "backendPort": 5000,
          "enableFloatingIP": false,
          "idleTimeoutInMinutes": 10,
          "protocol": "Tcp",
          "enableDestinationServiceEndpoint": false,
          "enableTcpReset": false,
          "allowBackendPortConflict": false,
          "loadDistribution": "Default",
          "disableOutboundSnat": true,
          "backendAddressPool": {
            "id": "/subscriptions/0-0-0-0/resourceGroups/test-hbtest/providers/Microsoft.Network/loadBalancers/hbtest1/backendAddressPools/hbtest1"
          },
          "probe": {
            "id": "/subscriptions/0-0-0-0/resourceGroups/test-hbtest/providers/Microsoft.Network/loadBalancers/hbtest1/probes/rule1"
          }
        }
      }
    ],
    "probes": [
      {
        "name": "rule1",
        "id": "/subscriptions/0-0-0-0/resourceGroups/test-hbtest/providers/Microsoft.Network/loadBalancers/hbtest1/probes/rule1",
        "etag": "W/\"1867ac9a-5eca-431f-831c-939768a65794\"",
        "properties": {
          "provisioningState": "Succeeded",
          "protocol": "Tcp",
          "port": 5000,
          "intervalInSeconds": 15,
          "numberOfProbes": 2,
          "loadBalancingRules": [
            {
              "id": "/subscriptions/0-0-0-0/resourceGroups/test-hbtest/providers/Microsoft.Network/loadBalancers/hbtest1/loadBalancingRules/rule1"
            }
          ]
        },
        "type": "Microsoft.Network/loadBalancers/probes"
      }
    ],
    "inboundNatRules": [],
    "outboundRules": [],
    "inboundNatPools": []
  },
  "sku": {
    "name": "Standard"
  }
}

PUT https://management.azure.com/subscriptions/0-0-0-0/resourceGroups/test-hbtest/providers/Microsoft.Network/loadBalancers/hbtest1?api-version=2020-05-01 HTTP/2.0

{
    "id": "/subscriptions/0-0-0-0/resourceGroups/test-hbtest/providers/Microsoft.Network/loadBalancers/hbtest1",
    "location": "eastus2",
    "properties": {
        "frontendIPConfigurations": [
            {
                "id": "/subscriptions/0-0-0-0/resourceGroups/test-hbtest/providers/Microsoft.Network/loadBalancers/hbtest1/frontendIPConfigurations/hbtest1",
                "name": "hbtest1",
                "properties": {
                    "loadBalancingRules": [
                        {
                            "id": "/subscriptions/0-0-0-0/resourceGroups/test-hbtest/providers/Microsoft.Network/loadBalancers/hbtest1/loadBalancingRules/rule1"
                        }
                    ],
                    "privateIPAddress": "10.0.1.4",
                    "privateIPAllocationMethod": "Dynamic",
                    "privateIPAddressVersion": "IPv4",
                    "subnet": {
                        "id": "/subscriptions/0-0-0-0/resourceGroups/test-hbtest/providers/Microsoft.Network/virtualNetworks/acceptanceTestVirtualNetwork1/subnets/testsubnet"
                    },
                    "provisioningState": "Succeeded"
                }
            }
        ],
        "backendAddressPools": [
            {
                "id": "/subscriptions/0-0-0-0/resourceGroups/test-hbtest/providers/Microsoft.Network/loadBalancers/hbtest1/backendAddressPools/hbtest1",
                "name": "hbtest1",
                "properties": {
                    "backendIPConfigurations": [
                        {
                            "id": "/subscriptions/0-0-0-0/resourceGroups/test-hbtest/providers/Microsoft.Compute/virtualMachineScaleSets/hbtest1/virtualMachines/1/networkInterfaces/primary/ipConfigurations/primary"
                        },
                        {
                            "id": "/subscriptions/0-0-0-0/resourceGroups/test-hbtest/providers/Microsoft.Compute/virtualMachineScaleSets/hbtest1/virtualMachines/2/networkInterfaces/primary/ipConfigurations/primary"
                        },
                        {
                            "id": "/subscriptions/0-0-0-0/resourceGroups/test-hbtest/providers/Microsoft.Compute/virtualMachineScaleSets/hbtest1/virtualMachines/0/networkInterfaces/primary/ipConfigurations/primary"
                        }
                    ],
                    "loadBalancerBackendAddresses": [
                        {
                            "name": "test-hbtest_hbtest1_virtualMachines_1_networkInterfaces_primaryprimary",
                            "properties": {
                                "networkInterfaceIPConfiguration": {
                                    "id": "/subscriptions/0-0-0-0/resourceGroups/test-hbtest/providers/Microsoft.Compute/virtualMachineScaleSets/hbtest1/virtualMachines/1/networkInterfaces/primary/ipConfigurations/primary"
                                }
                            }
                        },
                        {
                            "name": "test-hbtest_hbtest1_virtualMachines_2_networkInterfaces_primaryprimary",
                            "properties": {
                                "networkInterfaceIPConfiguration": {
                                    "id": "/subscriptions/0-0-0-0/resourceGroups/test-hbtest/providers/Microsoft.Compute/virtualMachineScaleSets/hbtest1/virtualMachines/2/networkInterfaces/primary/ipConfigurations/primary"
                                }
                            }
                        },
                        {
                            "name": "test-hbtest_hbtest1_virtualMachines_0_networkInterfaces_primaryprimary",
                            "properties": {
                                "networkInterfaceIPConfiguration": {
                                    "id": "/subscriptions/0-0-0-0/resourceGroups/test-hbtest/providers/Microsoft.Compute/virtualMachineScaleSets/hbtest1/virtualMachines/0/networkInterfaces/primary/ipConfigurations/primary"
                                }
                            }
                        }
                    ],
                    "loadBalancingRules": [
                        {
                            "id": "/subscriptions/0-0-0-0/resourceGroups/test-hbtest/providers/Microsoft.Network/loadBalancers/hbtest1/loadBalancingRules/rule1"
                        }
                    ],
                    "provisioningState": "Succeeded"
                }
            }
        ],
        "loadBalancingRules": [],
        "probes": [
            {
                "id": "/subscriptions/0-0-0-0/resourceGroups/test-hbtest/providers/Microsoft.Network/loadBalancers/hbtest1/probes/rule1",
                "name": "rule1",
                "properties": {
                    "loadBalancingRules": [
                        {
                            "id": "/subscriptions/0-0-0-0/resourceGroups/test-hbtest/providers/Microsoft.Network/loadBalancers/hbtest1/loadBalancingRules/rule1"
                        }
                    ],
                    "protocol": "Tcp",
                    "port": 5000,
                    "intervalInSeconds": 15,
                    "numberOfProbes": 2,
                    "provisioningState": "Succeeded"
                }
            }
        ],
        "inboundNatRules": [],
        "inboundNatPools": [],
        "outboundRules": [],
        "resourceGuid": "bf36d61a-728d-4255-8292-4397720a279d",
        "provisioningState": "Succeeded"
    },
    "sku": {
        "name": "Standard"
    },
    "tags": {}
}

Response:

{
    "error": {
        "code": "InvalidRequestFormat",
        "details": [
            {
                "code": "DuplicateIpConfigurationReferenceOnBackendAddressPool",
                "message": "Found duplicate ipConfiguration reference /subscriptions/0-0-0-0/resourceGroups/test-hbtest/providers/Microsoft.Network/networkInterfaces/|providers|Microsoft.Compute|virtualMachineScaleSets|hbtest1|virtualMachines|1|networkInterfaces|primary/ipConfigurations/primary on backend pool addresses /subscriptions//resourceGroups//providers/Microsoft.Network/loadBalancers//backendAddressPools//loadBalancerBackendAddresses/ and /subscriptions//resourceGroups//providers/Microsoft.Network/loadBalancers//backendAddressPools/hbtest1/loadBalancerBackendAddresses/70f3bd40-2344-4c29-8177-768d4c3ca926."
            },
            {
                "code": "DuplicateIpConfigurationReferenceOnBackendAddressPool",
                "message": "Found duplicate ipConfiguration reference /subscriptions/0-0-0-0/resourceGroups/test-hbtest/providers/Microsoft.Network/networkInterfaces/|providers|Microsoft.Compute|virtualMachineScaleSets|hbtest1|virtualMachines|2|networkInterfaces|primary/ipConfigurations/primary on backend pool addresses /subscriptions//resourceGroups//providers/Microsoft.Network/loadBalancers//backendAddressPools//loadBalancerBackendAddresses/ and /subscriptions//resourceGroups//providers/Microsoft.Network/loadBalancers//backendAddressPools/hbtest1/loadBalancerBackendAddresses/46147dc8-81bf-42be-8372-7815357a3f3f."
            },
            {
                "code": "DuplicateIpConfigurationReferenceOnBackendAddressPool",
                "message": "Found duplicate ipConfiguration reference /subscriptions/0-0-0-0/resourceGroups/test-hbtest/providers/Microsoft.Network/networkInterfaces/|providers|Microsoft.Compute|virtualMachineScaleSets|hbtest1|virtualMachines|0|networkInterfaces|primary/ipConfigurations/primary on backend pool addresses /subscriptions//resourceGroups//providers/Microsoft.Network/loadBalancers//backendAddressPools//loadBalancerBackendAddresses/ and /subscriptions//resourceGroups//providers/Microsoft.Network/loadBalancers//backendAddressPools/hbtest1/loadBalancerBackendAddresses/a34f230b-359e-42a3-bb2e-921085c852b8."
            }
        ],
        "message": "Cannot parse the request."
    }
}

The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:

Himanshu191 · 2020-07-13T16:53:35Z

I am also facing the same issue, please fix

mrlesmithjr · 2020-07-14T01:27:29Z

I just ran into this issue as well. I am pretty sure I didn't experience this until after implementing Scale Sets. But could be wrong.

Error: Error Creating/Updating Load Balancer "lbi.example.example-poc.development.services" (Resource Group "rg.example.example-poc.development.services"): network.LoadBalancersClient#CreateOrUpdate: Failure sending request: StatusCode=400 -- Original Error: Code="InvalidRequestFormat" Message="Cannot parse the request." Details=[{"code":"DuplicateIpConfigurationReferenceOnBackendAddressPool","message":"Found duplicate ipConfiguration reference /subscriptions/134b3809-76mf-4891-bf25-edfaf8d5fc6f/resourceGroups/rg.example.example-poc.development.services/providers/Microsoft.Network/networkInterfaces/nic-wpapp01.example.example-poc.development.services/ipConfigurations/ip-wpapp01.example.example-poc.development.services on backend pool addresses /subscriptions//resourceGroups//providers/Microsoft.Network/loadBalancers//backendAddressPools//loadBalancerBackendAddresses/ and /subscriptions//resourceGroups//providers/Microsoft.Network/loadBalancers//backendAddressPools/lbi-wpapp.example.example-poc.development.services/loadBalancerBackendAddresses/0af31b77-ec08-4910-a328-66fe0662a851."},{"code":"DuplicateIpConfigurationReferenceOnBackendAddressPool","message":"Found duplicate ipConfiguration reference /subscriptions/134b3809-76mf-4891-bf25-edfaf8d5fc6f/resourceGroups/rg.example.example-poc.development.services/providers/Microsoft.Network/networkInterfaces/nic-wpapp02.example.example-poc.development.services/ipConfigurations/ip-wpapp02.example.example-poc.development.services on backend pool addresses /subscriptions//resourceGroups//providers/Microsoft.Network/loadBalancers//backendAddressPools//loadBalancerBackendAddresses/ and /subscriptions//resourceGroups//providers/Microsoft.Network/loadBalancers//backendAddressPools/lbi-wpapp.example.example-poc.development.services/loadBalancerBackendAddresses/e7c37c29-a3ac-403d-b234-a74009841b8a."}]

mstavrev · 2020-07-17T14:11:22Z

We have the same problem, please fix

EppO · 2020-07-20T21:15:48Z

This also affects any regular VMs in a Standard LB's backend pool

Error: Error Creating/Updating Load Balancer "LB-TEST01" (Resource Group "RGP-TESTAZURERMv2"): 
network.LoadBalancersClient#CreateOrUpdate: Failure sending request: StatusCode=400 -- 
Original Error: 
Code="InvalidRequestFormat" 
Message="Cannot parse the request." 
Details=[{ 
"code":"DuplicateIpConfigurationReferenceOnBackendAddressPool",
"message":"Found duplicate ipConfiguration reference /subscriptions/xxxxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxxxx/resourceGroups/RGP-TESTAZURERMv2/providers/Microsoft.Network/networkInterfaces/vmtest01_nic-eth0/ipConfigurations/vmtest01-SubnetIPConfig on backend pool addresses /subscriptions//resourceGroups//providers/Microsoft.Network/loadBalancers//backendAddressPools//loadBalancerBackendAddresses/ and /subscriptions//resourceGroups//providers/Microsoft.Network/loadBalancers//backendAddressPools/LB-TEST01-backend_pool/loadBalancerBackendAddresses/xxxxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxxxx."},
{"code":"DuplicateIpConfigurationReferenceOnBackendAddressPool",
"message":"Found duplicate ipConfiguration reference /subscriptions/xxxxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxxxx/resourceGroups/RGP-TESTAZURERMv2/providers/Microsoft.Network/networkInterfaces/vmtest02_nic-eth0/ipConfigurations/vmtest02-SubnetIPConfig on backend pool addresses /subscriptions//resourceGroups//providers/Microsoft.Network/loadBalancers//backendAddressPools//loadBalancerBackendAddresses/ and /subscriptions//resourceGroups//providers/Microsoft.Network/loadBalancers//backendAddressPools/LB-TEST01-backend_pool/loadBalancerBackendAddresses/xxxxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxxxx."
}]

mstavrev · 2020-07-20T22:19:15Z

You can temporarily lock down the azurerm module to version 2.17.0, it is still using the older Azure API and does not have this problem.

mrlesmithjr · 2020-07-20T22:37:10Z

So this is interesting, I am using 2.15.0 and seeing this issue quite regularly.

provider "azurerm" {
  client_id       = var.azurerm_client_id
  client_secret   = var.azurerm_client_secret
  subscription_id = var.azurerm_subscription_id
  tenant_id       = var.azurerm_tenant_id
  version         = "~> 2.15"
  features {}
}

mstavrev · 2020-07-20T22:42:11Z

According to https://www.terraform.io/docs/configuration/modules.html#module-versions with "~> 2.15" you are allowing any version up to (excluding) 3.0.0. So, most likely you are using right now 2.19, which is the highest available one < 3.0.0

mrlesmithjr · 2020-07-20T22:42:54Z

That is actually true. Thanks for catching that!

mstavrev · 2020-07-20T22:44:34Z

Btw, just in case it matters for some one, the same issue exist with managing LB health checks - same exact issue, and same (temporary) fix.

mrlesmithjr · 2020-07-20T22:50:09Z

Saw this there as well. I am about to kick off a pipeline build to see if this solves the issues I've experienced as well. Just to clarify, I have pinned the provider to 2.17

provider "azurerm" {
  client_id       = var.azurerm_client_id
  client_secret   = var.azurerm_client_secret
  subscription_id = var.azurerm_subscription_id
  tenant_id       = var.azurerm_tenant_id
  version         = "= 2.17"
  features {}
}

mrlesmithjr · 2020-07-20T23:19:21Z

Curious whether this is related as well. I have put in depends_on which seems to get around the race conditions I have been experiencing. Just a thought.

magodo · 2020-07-21T01:03:47Z

Hi @zikalino or @qianwens Could you please take a look at this?
BTW, does #10131 fixes this?

mrlesmithjr · 2020-07-21T02:25:42Z

Just as an FYI. I have gone through pipeline several times now with success using 2.17. That is about 173 resources spinning up, tearing down, and spinning up again. This also includes removing the depends_on that I mentioned earlier. I will be testing quite a bit more as well.

UPDATE - The fourth teardown has gone into a race condition. So, maybe not related.

gek0 · 2020-08-19T07:45:57Z

This one is still active and present :(
but it does work with the 2.17 version of the azurerm provider!

Test case - deploy Azure Loadbalancer

1x frontend
1x backend pool (add X VMs to it)
X health checks and ACL rules added to that backend pool

-> now create another backend pool or even a separate frontend and the same setup on the existing one
-> it fails to create a backend or even remove the existing one which is in no way connected to the backend that has VMs added to!

Error output:

[
  {
    "code":"DuplicateIpConfigurationReferenceOnBackendAddressPool",
    "message":"Found duplicate ipConfiguration reference /subscriptions/<SUBSCRIPTION_ID>/resourceGroups/<RG_NAME>/providers/Microsoft.Network/networkInterfaces/<VM-1>/ipConfigurations/primary on backend pool addresses /subscriptions//resourceGroups//providers/Microsoft.Network/loadBalancers//backendAddressPools//loadBalancerBackendAddresses/ and /subscriptions//resourceGroups//providers/Microsoft.Network/loadBalancers//backendAddressPools/backend-internal-dns/loadBalancerBackendAddresses/XXXXXX."
  },
  {
    "code":"DuplicateIpConfigurationReferenceOnBackendAddressPool",
    "message":"Found duplicate ipConfiguration reference /subscriptions/<SUBSCRIPTION_ID>/resourceGroups/<RG_NAME>/providers/Microsoft.Network/networkInterfaces/<VM-2>/ipConfigurations/primary on backend pool addresses /subscriptions//resourceGroups//providers/Microsoft.Network/loadBalancers//backendAddressPools//loadBalancerBackendAddresses/ and /subscriptions//resourceGroups//providers/Microsoft.Network/loadBalancers//backendAddressPools/backend-internal-dns/loadBalancerBackendAddresses/XXXXXX."
  }
]

tombuildsstuff · 2020-08-19T08:48:21Z

@ArcturusZhang can we get the "Service Attention" and "Load Balancer" labels on this one so the service team can look at this API bug?

magodo · 2020-08-19T09:20:12Z

@ArcturusZhang Additionally, please check whether #10131 has already addressed that.

ghost · 2020-08-20T06:03:22Z

Thanks for the feedback! We are routing this to the appropriate team for follow-up. cc @slbsupportgithub.

gek0 · 2020-09-15T07:35:39Z

any updates regarding this fix in new provider version/upstream API?

ArcturusZhang · 2020-09-16T05:40:16Z

Hi @gek0 this issue should have been fixed. I am going to close this issue. Please feel free to reopen this or comment if you see this issue again.

ArcturusZhang · 2020-10-21T02:24:04Z

Reopen per request

magodo · 2020-10-21T03:11:03Z

#10131 doesn't actually fix this issue, this should be fixed on service side.

tombuildsstuff · 2021-01-20T12:11:40Z

👋 any update here?

magodo · 2021-01-21T03:41:44Z

@tombuildsstuff Confirmed with service team, this has been fixed. I've created a PR hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#10263 for the linked TF issue.

ghost added needs-triage Workflow: This is a new issue that needs to be triaged to the appropriate team. question The issue doesn't require a change to the product in order to be resolved. Most issues start as that labels Jul 13, 2020

openapi-assignment-bot bot assigned zikalino and qianwens Jul 13, 2020

magodo mentioned this issue Jul 13, 2020

2.18.0 - Error removing/updating load balancer rules hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#7691

Closed

ArcturusZhang mentioned this issue Aug 18, 2020

Loss of data when marshaling model types Azure/azure-sdk-for-go#12227

Closed

ArcturusZhang added Network - Load Balancer Service Attention Workflow: This issue is responsible by Azure service team. labels Aug 20, 2020

openapi-assignment-bot bot unassigned zikalino and qianwens Aug 20, 2020

ghost removed the needs-triage Workflow: This is a new issue that needs to be triaged to the appropriate team. label Aug 20, 2020

ArcturusZhang removed the question The issue doesn't require a change to the product in order to be resolved. Most issues start as that label Aug 20, 2020

ArcturusZhang closed this as completed Sep 16, 2020

ArcturusZhang reopened this Oct 21, 2020

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Network (2020-05-01): Error removing/updating load balancer rules #10104

Network (2020-05-01): Error removing/updating load balancer rules #10104

magodo commented Jul 13, 2020

Himanshu191 commented Jul 13, 2020

mrlesmithjr commented Jul 14, 2020

mstavrev commented Jul 17, 2020

EppO commented Jul 20, 2020

mstavrev commented Jul 20, 2020

mrlesmithjr commented Jul 20, 2020

mstavrev commented Jul 20, 2020

mrlesmithjr commented Jul 20, 2020

mstavrev commented Jul 20, 2020

mrlesmithjr commented Jul 20, 2020

mrlesmithjr commented Jul 20, 2020 •

edited

Loading

magodo commented Jul 21, 2020

mrlesmithjr commented Jul 21, 2020 •

edited

Loading

gek0 commented Aug 19, 2020

tombuildsstuff commented Aug 19, 2020

magodo commented Aug 19, 2020

ghost commented Aug 20, 2020

gek0 commented Sep 15, 2020

ArcturusZhang commented Sep 16, 2020

ArcturusZhang commented Oct 21, 2020

magodo commented Oct 21, 2020

tombuildsstuff commented Jan 20, 2021

magodo commented Jan 21, 2021

Network (2020-05-01): Error removing/updating load balancer rules #10104

Network (2020-05-01): Error removing/updating load balancer rules #10104

Comments

magodo commented Jul 13, 2020

Himanshu191 commented Jul 13, 2020

mrlesmithjr commented Jul 14, 2020

mstavrev commented Jul 17, 2020

EppO commented Jul 20, 2020

mstavrev commented Jul 20, 2020

mrlesmithjr commented Jul 20, 2020

mstavrev commented Jul 20, 2020

mrlesmithjr commented Jul 20, 2020

mstavrev commented Jul 20, 2020

mrlesmithjr commented Jul 20, 2020

mrlesmithjr commented Jul 20, 2020 • edited Loading

magodo commented Jul 21, 2020

mrlesmithjr commented Jul 21, 2020 • edited Loading

gek0 commented Aug 19, 2020

tombuildsstuff commented Aug 19, 2020

magodo commented Aug 19, 2020

ghost commented Aug 20, 2020

gek0 commented Sep 15, 2020

ArcturusZhang commented Sep 16, 2020

ArcturusZhang commented Oct 21, 2020

magodo commented Oct 21, 2020

tombuildsstuff commented Jan 20, 2021

magodo commented Jan 21, 2021

mrlesmithjr commented Jul 20, 2020 •

edited

Loading

mrlesmithjr commented Jul 21, 2020 •

edited

Loading