Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Measure and investigate feasibility of some code size optimizations for Base64 APIs #1817

Closed
ahsonkhan opened this issue Jul 8, 2021 · 3 comments
Closed

Measure and investigate feasibility of some code size optimizations for Base64 APIs #1817

ahsonkhan opened this issue Jul 8, 2021 · 3 comments
Labels
Azure.Core Client This issue points to a problem in the data-plane of the library. feature-request This issue requires a new behavior in the product in order be resolved. pillar-performance The issue is related to performance, one of our core engineering pillars.
Milestone
Backlog

Comments

@ahsonkhan
Copy link
Member

Follow-up from #1816

cc @RickWinter
@ahsonkhan ahsonkhan added Azure.Core pillar-performance The issue is related to performance, one of our core engineering pillars. labels Jul 8, 2021
@ahsonkhan ahsonkhan added this to the Backlog milestone Jul 8, 2021
@ahsonkhan ahsonkhan self-assigned this Jul 8, 2021
@ahsonkhan ahsonkhan mentioned this issue Jul 8, 2021
Merged
@ahsonkhan
Copy link
Member Author

@danewalton let me know the before/after for code size if you notice a large spike in either direction.

@RickWinter RickWinter added the Client This issue points to a problem in the data-plane of the library. label Aug 4, 2021
@RickWinter RickWinter added the feature-request This issue requires a new behavior in the product in order be resolved. label Aug 4, 2021
@danewalton
Copy link
Member

Lib Size (Bytes)
Embedded (No precond) 0x339 (825)
mbedTLS 0x314 (788)
AzureRTOS/FreeRTOS middleware impl 0x2BE (702)

@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link

Hi @ahsonkhan, we deeply appreciate your input into this project. Regrettably, this issue has remained inactive for over 2 years, leading us to the decision to close it. We've implemented this policy to maintain the relevance of our issue queue and facilitate easier navigation for new contributors. If you still believe this topic requires attention, please feel free to create a new issue, referencing this one. Thank you for your understanding and ongoing support.

@github-actions github-actions bot closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Mar 15, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Mar 15, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Azure.Core Client This issue points to a problem in the data-plane of the library. feature-request This issue requires a new behavior in the product in order be resolved. pillar-performance The issue is related to performance, one of our core engineering pillars.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
Backlog
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@RickWinter @ahsonkhan @danewalton