Board Review: Management Plane Namespace Review Microsoft.VerifiedId

[mmorr-msft]

Thank you for submitting this review request. Thorough review of your management library namespaces ensures that your library names are consistent with the guidelines and the consumers of your management library have a consistently good experience when using Azure.

To ensure consistency, all language library names will generally be reviewed together.

Before submitting, ensure you adjust the title of the issue appropriately.

Note that the required material must be included before a meeting can be scheduled.

Contacts and Timeline

• Responsible service team: Decentralized Identity Services
• Main contacts: ruizjuan, mmorr, muali
• Expected code complete date: 6/1/24
• Expected release date: 7/1/24

About the Service (required)

• Link to documentation introducing/describing the service: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/entra/verified-id/decentralized-identifier-overview
• Link to the service REST APIs Specs: https://github.com/Azure/azure-rest-api-specs-pr/tree/RPSaaSMaster/specification/verifiedid
• Link to GitHub issue for previous review sessions, if applicable:

Namespace Proposals (required per language)

In the examples below please replace every occurrence of [ResourceProviderName] with your the service resource provider name. Be sure to keep the casing shown with [ResourceProviderName] when replacing it with the service resource provider name.

• .NET: Azure.ResourceManager.VerifiedId
• Java: azure-resourcemanager-verifiedid (com.azure.resourcemanager.verifiedid)
• Go/Golang: sdk/resourcemanager/verifiedid/armverifiedid
• JavaScript: @azure/arm-verifiedid
• Python: azure-mgmt-verifiedid

Thank you!

[ArthurMa1978]

LGTM.

[ronniegeraghty]

Now we'll move to the second phase of the approval process. The proposed namespaces we'll be shown to our SDK architects. The architects will have one week to make any objections to the names. If there are no objections by end of business on 5/15, the names will be considered approved, and I'll add a comment to this issue stating so.

[ronniegeraghty]

The week is up and there have been no objections to the proposed namespaces in the description of this issue. They are now considered approved.