You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The faces of the Mesh have a useful attribute 'is_loaded' that can be used to set up openings in a form-diagram. However when this attribute is modified, the tributary area of the adjacent vertices obtained with the method Mesh.vertex_area() are not updated.
Details
In the code below, I check the vertices of a given mesh.face and I verify that it is set with 'is_loaded' attribute = True. However by changing this attribute to 'is_loaded' = False the vertex_area of all nodes that should be affected is not updated.
Describe the solution you'd like
What is the best way to update these tributary loads easily?
Which feature can be added?
I think it make sense that when .vertex_area() is called it consider only the adjacent faces that have the parameter 'is_loaded': True. Other alternative would be introducing a method .tributary_area() possibly considering this options. What do you think?
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Feature Request
The faces of the Mesh have a useful attribute 'is_loaded' that can be used to set up openings in a form-diagram. However when this attribute is modified, the tributary area of the adjacent vertices obtained with the method Mesh.vertex_area() are not updated.
Details
In the code below, I check the vertices of a given mesh.face and I verify that it is set with 'is_loaded' attribute = True. However by changing this attribute to 'is_loaded' = False the vertex_area of all nodes that should be affected is not updated.
Describe the solution you'd like
What is the best way to update these tributary loads easily?
Which feature can be added?
I think it make sense that when .vertex_area() is called it consider only the adjacent faces that have the parameter 'is_loaded': True. Other alternative would be introducing a method .tributary_area() possibly considering this options. What do you think?
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: