You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thank you very much for making your work openly available.
I have been processing some GE P files using FID-A (with run_pressproc_GEauto) to generate raw (water suppressed and unsuppressed) files, that I then analyse using lcmodel via the command line. I have found that this results in slightly different metabolite concentrations, and slightly worse S/N ratios compared to just running the P file through the lcmodel GUI. I was wondering if you had any idea why this may be occurring, or any advice to hopefully get the command line results to match the GUI results?
Thank you!!
Rob
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Just a brief update - using the unprocessed raw files which written to disk automatically gives a much closer match with the lcmgui results (although still not 100%)
Dear Dr Near and other FIDF-A analyses,
Thank you very much for making your work openly available.
I have been processing some GE P files using FID-A (with run_pressproc_GEauto) to generate raw (water suppressed and unsuppressed) files, that I then analyse using lcmodel via the command line. I have found that this results in slightly different metabolite concentrations, and slightly worse S/N ratios compared to just running the P file through the lcmodel GUI. I was wondering if you had any idea why this may be occurring, or any advice to hopefully get the command line results to match the GUI results?
Thank you!!
Rob
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: