-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Incorporating non-datalogger data into processing pipeline #213
Comments
Minor problem: timestampsThe datalogger ( Minor problem: flagging originDo we want a new Major problem: ID matchingWe need to match Major problem: name matchingWe need to match column names from the raw instrument files to those used by @roylrich 's logger code. I can think of two ways to do this:
|
@bpbond, |
Thanks, Roy, and I agree it would be good for you and me and @stephpenn1 to discuss. |
@bpbond I think a flag of file origin is a good idea! Not sure yet how to ID matching. An idea is using Device serial number. In row 6 of internall data we find "Device S/N = 848067" (note for coding: we have a unit with 7 digits number). We have a spredsheet we use for flagging when it is out of water that relate serial number and site and zone (location): https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1XbIt8gsOWaLBmpzUmnupKzt92GocHBMooD-MNyvijIY/edit?gid=0#gid=0 |
@Fausto2504 ah THANK YOU, I had forgotten about that spreadsheet. That is exactly what we will need! Serial number -> Site, plot, and troll A/B/C. |
Summary:
|
@Fausto2504 @nickdward request :
I want to think through in detail how this would work. As an example, here are the fields in a datalogger "WaterLevel600A" file versus the sample raw file:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: