Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

/clearmessages is broken #5281

Closed
4 tasks done
21mtd opened this issue Mar 30, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #5282
Closed
4 tasks done

/clearmessages is broken #5281

21mtd opened this issue Mar 30, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #5282
Labels
bug Something isn't working as intended, or works in a confusing/unintuitive way for the user

Comments

@21mtd
Copy link

21mtd commented Mar 30, 2024

Checklist

  • I'm reporting a problem with Chatterino
  • I've verified that I'm running the most recent nightly build or stable release
  • I've looked for my problem on the wiki
  • I've searched the issues and pull requests for similar looking reports

Describe your issue

Type /clearmessages doesn't clear the chat immediately

It only clears Highlights (sub, mentions,..) on scrollbar, sometimes a few message lines only.

It will clear the whole chat later if new messages are loaded or by moving your cursor around channel split/border/name

Screenshots

2024-03-30.20-51-04.mp4

OS and Chatterino Version

Chatterino Nightly 2.4.6 (commit 69bdac9) built on 2024-03-30 with Qt 6.5.0, MSVC 193833135 Running on Windows 10 Version 22H2, kernel: 10.0.19045

@21mtd 21mtd added the issue-report An issue reported by a user. label Mar 30, 2024
@Felanbird Felanbird added bug Something isn't working as intended, or works in a confusing/unintuitive way for the user and removed issue-report An issue reported by a user. labels Mar 31, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working as intended, or works in a confusing/unintuitive way for the user
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants