-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 103
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Create a community collection of configuration and identifiers #37
Comments
Sounds like a good idea. I was hoping that calling researchers to collaborate on this, both in conferences and in twitter, will be enough. But thus far we received 0 commits / pull requests with added configurations / identifiers. The point in presenting this plugin in conferences was exactly this, to get community collaboration to build a massive collection of identifiers / configurations. Sadly, I already tried the first option, and options 2 and 3 would only make sense once people start submitting new things, otherwise the ROI would be negative. |
For (1) this can be a step in the doc. Just after compiling the config and identifier. Something like "Please consider to submit the config you created to the community collection of configurations and fingerprints." Having a repository that aims to collect all the configurations feels more welcoming to me than pushing new configuration to the main repository |
For some reason readthedocs fails when I try to build the new documentation. Hopefully it will get fixed in the next few days so the new docs will include this new update. |
Fixed the docs in #40, now readthedocs is updated to reflect the call to share with us the added support / configs. |
On the one hand, thank you very much for such a great plugin. What this plugin does - I've been doing it by hand for the last 15 years. |
I think it is a good idea to have a community-driven collection of Identifiers and Configurations for Karta. When such a collection get bigger, it will increase the chances that the configuration you are looking for was already created by a community member.
I think that such a solution can be achieved in several ways:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: