Use of a shared bucket?

[LeoLapworthKT]

We've started using this great module more and more across our stacks.

But we now have a dozen S3 buckets all with just 1 zip file in and as we intent to use it even more it made me wonder about if it could be made to use a shared bucket? It's not a blocker, but we had to ask for our S3 bucket quota to be raised which made me ponder this.

If we looked into submitting a patch would you be interested in this?

[kichik]

We've started using this great module more and more across our stacks.

Awesome 🙌

If we looked into submitting a patch would you be interested in this?

For sure. It was always a future thing. I didn't want to worry about possible zip conflicts on the first iteration. I think we can maybe completely prevent this with an object prefix based on the stack and resource name. Maybe even make that prefix be something the user can override.