Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Compare Tikhonet to SCORE #14

Open
4 tasks done
fadinammour opened this issue Feb 1, 2021 · 2 comments
Open
4 tasks done

Compare Tikhonet to SCORE #14

fadinammour opened this issue Feb 1, 2021 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@fadinammour
Copy link
Collaborator

fadinammour commented Feb 1, 2021

Goal : establish a comparison between Tikhonet vs Tikhonet+Shape Constraint vs Sparse Deconvolution vs Sparse Deconvolution+Shape Constraint (SCORE)

  • extract a data set for the test.
  • run tests on each method.
  • set metrics.
  • analyse results.
@fadinammour fadinammour added the enhancement New feature or request label Feb 1, 2021
@fadinammour
Copy link
Collaborator Author

As a first approach, we can start by extracting 2048 images (by ideally setting seeds for Numpy and TensorFlow random generators) and saving them. However, on the long run, it would be better to have more galaxies.
By doing so, we would be able to compare different approaches on the exact same objects.

@fadinammour
Copy link
Collaborator Author

For the time being the dataset that is generated has been filtered by removing the galaxies which window estimation failed. These galaxies usually correspond to unresolved galaxies which shape study is not relevant (for more details see issue 12). The filtering processing removes 33-40% of the galaxies.
In this notebook, an initial batch of 128*24 = 3072 is generated. 40% of the galaxies have a window failure which give a finale size of roughly 1840 galaxy.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant