Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Has this been tested to work with Chocoloatey? #28

Open
dougthor42 opened this issue Mar 30, 2018 · 5 comments
Open

Has this been tested to work with Chocoloatey? #28

dougthor42 opened this issue Mar 30, 2018 · 5 comments

Comments

@dougthor42
Copy link

Has this been tested to work with Chocolatey?

According to the Chocolatey Docs, Chocolatey "is compatible everywhere you can put a NuGet package".

Thoughts?

@Daniel15
Copy link
Owner

Daniel15 commented Apr 1, 2018

I haven't tested it myself... Let me know how you go.

@helge000
Copy link
Contributor

helge000 commented Apr 9, 2018

@dougthor42, I am using it with chocolatey since a year now and have had no issues.

@dougthor42
Copy link
Author

Awesome, thanks @helge000! I hope to set it up by the end of this week. If there are any caveats that I find I'll be sure to record them here.

@ferventcoder
Copy link

Just throwing this out there as @helge000 found this - We made some new optimizations to Chocolatey for 0.10.12+ - these optimizations mean we are using the Packages() url with a filter. It appears some repositories do not support this. We've put out a beta for folks to shut off the optimizations by affected repositories (0.10.14-beta).

References

@ferventcoder
Copy link

Should have been a bit more clear - Simple NuGet Server doesn't yet support those optimizations.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants