AWS integration included regions

[ggaugain]

What resources or data sources are affected?

datadog_integration_aws

Feature Request

AWS regions to include from metrics collection.
The excluded_regions requires a list to be maintained and does not automatically exclude data collection on a new AWS region.

Example of usage:

resource "datadog_integration_aws" "sandbox" {
account_id = "1234567890"
role_name = "DatadogAWSIntegrationRole"
filter_tags = ["key:value"]
host_tags = ["key:value", "key2:value2"]
account_specific_namespace_rules = {
auto_scaling = false
opsworks = false
}
included_regions = ["us-east-1", "us-west-2"]
}

References

No response

[iniinikoski]

This would definitely make sense.

[hhughes0]

+1

[ShaunKav]

+1

[knkcni]

would be a great way to deal with new regions

[danieljamesscott]

This would be great as we're currently getting perpetual drift trying to exclude the new ap-southeast-5 region. It seems to submit the request to datadog with no problem, but then a subsequent plan shows that the change has not been applied.

[fatbasstard]

Well, we just solve this inverted (Based on the regions from the OP):

locals {
  excluded_dd_regions = setsubtract(data.aws_regions.current.names, "us-east-1", "us-west-2")
}

data "aws_regions" "current" {
  all_regions = true
}

resource "datadog_integration_aws" "default" {
  excluded_regions                     = var.excluded_regions
}

[fatbasstard]

@danieljamesscott Noticed this as well. Created an issue for that behaviour: #2548