Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Performance without pre-processing transforms.ColorJitter #16

Open
rshaojimmy opened this issue Jan 8, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

Performance without pre-processing transforms.ColorJitter #16

rshaojimmy opened this issue Jan 8, 2021 · 1 comment

Comments

@rshaojimmy
Copy link

Hi,

I find DeepALL with pre-processing transforms.ColorJitter can reach performance close to 76% Accuracy when test domain is sketch. (reported is 70.59%)

Have you tried your method without transforms.ColorJitter since I find your code uses it?

Thanks.

@Justinhzy
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks for your questions.
I haven't used DeeoAll before. I remember color jittering is useful in some domains, with around 2~3% boost in sketch domain for Jigen or our method.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants