From 0ad0c2801559b2304f28db937adf771ebdeb7177 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: GitHub Action Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2024 18:15:03 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Oyez transcript for 23-753. --- data/case_data.json | 171 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- data/podcast.rss | 6 +- data/podcast_spotify.rss | 49 ++++++++++- 3 files changed, 213 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) diff --git a/data/case_data.json b/data/case_data.json index 63c9cd1..2f56865 100644 --- a/data/case_data.json +++ b/data/case_data.json @@ -8662,14 +8662,171 @@ }, "23-753": { "docket_number": "23-753", - "name": "San Francisco v. EPA", - "date_argued_timestamp": 1729036800, - "audio_page_url": "https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/audio/2024/23-753", - "mp3_url": "https://www.supremecourt.gov/media/audio/mp3files/23-753.mp3", - "mp3_length": 5853, - "mp3_size": 46834850, - "source": "scotus", + "name": "City and County of San Francisco v. Environmental Protection Agency", + "date_argued_timestamp": 1729054800, "description": "

City and County of San Francisco v. Environmental Protection Agency

\n

Justia · Docket · oyez.org

\n

Argued on Oct 16, 2024.

\n

Petitioner: City and County of San Francisco, California.
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency.

\n

Advocates:

\n

Facts of the case (from oyez.org)

\n

The city of San Francisco operates a combined sewer system that collects both sewage and stormwater runoff. During heavy rains, the system can exceed its capacity, resulting in combined sewer overflows (CSOs) that discharge pollutants into the Pacific Ocean. The Clean Water Act requires cities like San Francisco to obtain a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit for such discharges. San Francisco has been implementing a CSO control plan since the late 1960s and completed construction of its current CSO control facilities in 1997.

\n

In 2019, the EPA and the California Regional Water Quality Control Board issued a new NPDES permit for San Francisco's Oceanside treatment facility. San Francisco is challenging two provisions in this permit: (1) narrative prohibitions against violating water quality standards, and (2) a requirement that San Francisco update its long-term CSO control plan. San Francisco argues that these provisions are inconsistent with the Clean Water Act and EPA regulations. The EPA\u2019s Environmental Appeals Board denied San Francisco's administrative appeal, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied San Francisco\u2019s petition for review, holding that the Clean Water Act authorizes EPA to include in the Oceanside NPDES permit the challenged provisions, and that EPA's decision to do so was rationally connected to evidence in the administrative record.

\n\n

Question

\n

Does the Clean Water Act allow the Environmental Protection Agency (or an authorized state) to impose generic prohibitions in National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permits that subject permit-holders to enforcement for violating water quality standards without identifying specific limits to which their discharges must conform?

\n\n ", + "mp3_length": 5853, + "mp3_size": 23443951, + "description_version": "v1", + "chapters": [ + { + "title": "Tara M. Steeley (for the Petitioner)", + "start": 0.135 + }, + { + "title": "Steeley - Justice Thomas", + "start": 128.83500005 + }, + { + "title": "Steeley - Justice Jackson", + "start": 243.155 + }, + { + "title": "Steeley - Justice Kagan", + "start": 352.735 + }, + { + "title": "Steeley - Justice Sotomayor", + "start": 498.5 + }, + { + "title": "Steeley - Justice Kagan", + "start": 886.69 + }, + { + "title": "Steeley - Justice Roberts", + "start": 1064.89 + }, + { + "title": "Steeley - Justice Kavanaugh", + "start": 1080.45 + }, + { + "title": "Steeley - Justice Sotomayor", + "start": 1145.505 + }, + { + "title": "Steeley - Justice Kagan", + "start": 1304.31 + }, + { + "title": "Steeley - Justice Jackson", + "start": 1384.45 + }, + { + "title": "Steeley - Justice Thomas", + "start": 1653.53 + }, + { + "title": "Steeley - Justice Alito", + "start": 1756.76 + }, + { + "title": "Steeley - Justice Sotomayor", + "start": 1868.905 + }, + { + "title": "Steeley - Justice Kagan", + "start": 2070.32 + }, + { + "title": "Steeley - Justice Gorsuch", + "start": 2254.39 + }, + { + "title": "Steeley - Justice Kavanaugh", + "start": 2339.4 + }, + { + "title": "Steeley - Justice Jackson", + "start": 2550.555 + }, + { + "title": "Frederick Liu (for the Respondent)", + "start": 2788.475 + }, + { + "title": "Liu - Justice Thomas", + "start": 2925.55 + }, + { + "title": "Liu - Justice Roberts", + "start": 3058.87 + }, + { + "title": "Liu - Justice Kavanaugh", + "start": 3340.75 + }, + { + "title": "Liu - Justice Kagan", + "start": 3510.65 + }, + { + "title": "Liu - Justice Kavanaugh", + "start": 3600.605 + }, + { + "title": "Liu - Justice Kagan", + "start": 3603.325 + }, + { + "title": "Liu - Justice Roberts", + "start": 3634.75 + }, + { + "title": "Liu - Justice Kavanaugh", + "start": 3675.32 + }, + { + "title": "Liu - Justice Barrett", + "start": 3694.99 + }, + { + "title": "Liu - Justice Alito", + "start": 3819.78 + }, + { + "title": "Liu - Justice Jackson", + "start": 4025.37 + }, + { + "title": "Liu - Justice Gorsuch", + "start": 4139.49 + }, + { + "title": "Liu - Justice Kavanaugh", + "start": 4522.24 + }, + { + "title": "Liu - Justice Alito", + "start": 4660.59 + }, + { + "title": "Liu - Justice Sotomayor", + "start": 4726.67 + }, + { + "title": "Liu - Justice Kagan", + "start": 5086.495 + }, + { + "title": "Liu - Justice Kavanaugh", + "start": 5239.26 + }, + { + "title": "Liu - Justice Barrett", + "start": 5433.06 + }, + { + "title": "Liu - Justice Jackson", + "start": 5515.11 + }, + { + "title": "Tara M. Steeley (for the Petitioner)", + "start": 5668.43 + } + ], + "source": "oyez", "b2_url": "https://f000.backblazeb2.com/file/scotus-podcast/2024/23-753.mp3" } } diff --git a/data/podcast.rss b/data/podcast.rss index 284a19b..b893cf7 100644 --- a/data/podcast.rss +++ b/data/podcast.rss @@ -49,10 +49,9 @@ Also available in video form at https://www.youtube.com/@SCOTUSOralArgument 4364 2024 Wed, 16 Oct 2024 10:00:00 -0400 - - [23-753] San Francisco v. EPA + [23-753] City and County of San Francisco v. Environmental Protection Agency City and County of San Francisco v. Environmental Protection Agency

Justia · Docket · oyez.org

Argued on Oct 16, 2024.

@@ -65,11 +64,12 @@ Also available in video form at https://www.youtube.com/@SCOTUSOralArgument

Question

Does the Clean Water Act allow the Environmental Protection Agency (or an authorized state) to impose generic prohibitions in National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permits that subject permit-holders to enforcement for violating water quality standards without identifying specific limits to which their discharges must conform?

]]> - + scotus_2024_23-753_v0 5853 2024 Wed, 16 Oct 2024 10:00:00 -0400 + [23-365] Medical Marijuana, Inc. v. Horn diff --git a/data/podcast_spotify.rss b/data/podcast_spotify.rss index 652e9ad..a95d046 100644 --- a/data/podcast_spotify.rss +++ b/data/podcast_spotify.rss @@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ Chapters: Wed, 16 Oct 2024 10:00:00 -0400 - [23-753] San Francisco v. EPA + [23-753] City and County of San Francisco v. Environmental Protection Agency City and County of San Francisco v. Environmental Protection Agency

Justia · Docket · oyez.org

Argued on Oct 16, 2024.

@@ -102,8 +102,51 @@ Chapters:

In 2019, the EPA and the California Regional Water Quality Control Board issued a new NPDES permit for San Francisco's Oceanside treatment facility. San Francisco is challenging two provisions in this permit: (1) narrative prohibitions against violating water quality standards, and (2) a requirement that San Francisco update its long-term CSO control plan. San Francisco argues that these provisions are inconsistent with the Clean Water Act and EPA regulations. The EPA’s Environmental Appeals Board denied San Francisco's administrative appeal, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied San Francisco’s petition for review, holding that the Clean Water Act authorizes EPA to include in the Oceanside NPDES permit the challenged provisions, and that EPA's decision to do so was rationally connected to evidence in the administrative record.

Question

-

Does the Clean Water Act allow the Environmental Protection Agency (or an authorized state) to impose generic prohibitions in National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permits that subject permit-holders to enforcement for violating water quality standards without identifying specific limits to which their discharges must conform?

]]> - +

Does the Clean Water Act allow the Environmental Protection Agency (or an authorized state) to impose generic prohibitions in National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permits that subject permit-holders to enforcement for violating water quality standards without identifying specific limits to which their discharges must conform?

+ + + +Chapters: +00:00:00 Tara M. Steeley (for the Petitioner) +00:02:08 Steeley - Justice Thomas +00:04:03 Steeley - Justice Jackson +00:05:52 Steeley - Justice Kagan +00:08:18 Steeley - Justice Sotomayor +00:14:46 Steeley - Justice Kagan +00:17:44 Steeley - Justice Roberts +00:18:00 Steeley - Justice Kavanaugh +00:19:05 Steeley - Justice Sotomayor +00:21:44 Steeley - Justice Kagan +00:23:04 Steeley - Justice Jackson +00:27:33 Steeley - Justice Thomas +00:29:16 Steeley - Justice Alito +00:31:08 Steeley - Justice Sotomayor +00:34:30 Steeley - Justice Kagan +00:37:34 Steeley - Justice Gorsuch +00:38:59 Steeley - Justice Kavanaugh +00:42:30 Steeley - Justice Jackson +00:46:28 Frederick Liu (for the Respondent) +00:48:45 Liu - Justice Thomas +00:50:58 Liu - Justice Roberts +00:55:40 Liu - Justice Kavanaugh +00:58:30 Liu - Justice Kagan +01:00:00 Liu - Justice Kavanaugh +01:00:03 Liu - Justice Kagan +01:00:34 Liu - Justice Roberts +01:01:15 Liu - Justice Kavanaugh +01:01:34 Liu - Justice Barrett +01:03:39 Liu - Justice Alito +01:07:05 Liu - Justice Jackson +01:08:59 Liu - Justice Gorsuch +01:15:22 Liu - Justice Kavanaugh +01:17:40 Liu - Justice Alito +01:18:46 Liu - Justice Sotomayor +01:24:46 Liu - Justice Kagan +01:27:19 Liu - Justice Kavanaugh +01:30:33 Liu - Justice Barrett +01:31:55 Liu - Justice Jackson +01:34:28 Tara M. Steeley (for the Petitioner)]]> + scotus_2024_23-753_v0 5853 2024