Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ACR spatial resolution #369

Open
elizaGSTT opened this issue Aug 2, 2023 · 8 comments
Open

ACR spatial resolution #369

elizaGSTT opened this issue Aug 2, 2023 · 8 comments
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@elizaGSTT
Copy link

@YassineAzma i am not sure i get the spatial resolution outcomes. shouldn't those values be up to 1 since the hole size in the insert is 1mm? most values come out quite large.

Screenshot 2023-08-02 at 15 02 33
@elizaGSTT elizaGSTT added the bug Something isn't working label Aug 2, 2023
@YassineAzma
Copy link
Collaborator

Does your data have a slanted edge?

@elizaGSTT
Copy link
Author

I guess the two pairs of the boxes with the holes are slightly slanted.. but i presume this is not what's measured? qualitatively we just look at how well these are separated for this test

image

@YassineAzma
Copy link
Collaborator

The MTF test for the ACR phantom currently uses the edge where the slice thickness inserts are to measure.

image
image

The test is described in Section 3 of this paper: https://opg.optica.org/oe/fulltext.cfm?uri=oe-22-5-6040&id=281325

If you'd like an option to utilise the old algorithm that was implemented for the MagNet phantom, raise an issue.

Just to reiterate, the ACR is not intended to be used to measure MTF. I don't have a suitable phantom or any time to validate this.

When performing this test for the MagNet phantom, did you receive values equal to the nominal spatial resolution?

@elizaGSTT
Copy link
Author

elizaGSTT commented Aug 2, 2023 via email

@YassineAzma
Copy link
Collaborator

Yes, this was discussed during meetings last year with Juliet. I don't recall if you were there. I'll go through the code of this function sometime this month, just to ensure that everything is working as it should be.

@elizaGSTT
Copy link
Author

elizaGSTT commented Aug 2, 2023 via email

@YassineAzma
Copy link
Collaborator

What are sensible readings? I'm not sure what the relationship between MTF50, which is what is being reported, and visual perception is. This is why I'm asking what type of results you get with the MagNet phantom. Were they comparable to the in-plane resolution?

@elizaGSTT
Copy link
Author

elizaGSTT commented Aug 2, 2023 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants