You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I would like to have a function in analogy to paramval_filter. The difference would be that instead of removing the rows where the filter condition is TRUE, it would introduce a new parameter that is TRUE or FALSE allowing to filter afterwards.
I need that for the phase shift values. We filter some points out of the Breit-Wigner fits, but plot the unfiltered data to show them as well. I want a column use_for_shift_fit which I could visualize with alpha. My current workaround is
The second alternative would be to create a new dataframe with this additional parameter. In this case it is a hassle though because I would have to write out ~300 parameter combinations to filter out 10.
I would like to have a function in analogy to paramval_filter. The difference would be that instead of removing the rows where the filter condition is TRUE, it would introduce a new parameter that is TRUE or FALSE allowing to filter afterwards.
I need that for the phase shift values. We filter some points out of the Breit-Wigner fits, but plot the unfiltered data to show them as well. I want a column
use_for_shift_fit
which I could visualize with alpha. My current workaround isfollowed by
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: