You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Extracts from messages on the HOL info mailing list:
I find it annoying that irule produces lots of new subgoals for the hypotheses. Is there a version that doesn't strip all the conjunctions, so they can be worked on together?
I agree about the stripping of conjunctions. My temptation is to just remove that feature entirely; making the user follow up with rpt conj_tac if that’s what they want doesn’t seem much of an imposition.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I'm totally sympathetic to this, but we documented this behaviour in the Kananaskis-11 release. Perhaps we should avoid introducing a backwards incompatibility. We could come up with another name for the behaviour without the strip_conj. What about rule, say?
No, I think the behaviour and documentation should be updated.
Additional thought: could we change match_mp_tac to be irule without conjunction stripping? Is that a superset of its current behaviour? (and does the backwards incompatibility of reducing failures matter?)
Extracts from messages on the HOL info mailing list:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: