You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The system test for the drivetrain and swerve modules is very basic and doesn't actually test any code in the drivetrain class. A more robust system test would mirror what we current test by hand as part of the pit checklist. That is the system test could perform and verify the following:
drive left (check swerve angle and velocity for each of the following)
drive right
drive forward
drive backward
rotate clockwise
rotate counterclockwise
I also think it would be good to incorporate the gyro into the drivetrain system test. I'm not sure how to do this. Perhaps it just prompts (via a beep?) us to rotate the robot clockwise and counterclockwise and verifies that the gyro angle is decreasing/increasing.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The system test for the drivetrain and swerve modules is very basic and doesn't actually test any code in the drivetrain class. A more robust system test would mirror what we current test by hand as part of the pit checklist. That is the system test could perform and verify the following:
I also think it would be good to incorporate the gyro into the drivetrain system test. I'm not sure how to do this. Perhaps it just prompts (via a beep?) us to rotate the robot clockwise and counterclockwise and verifies that the gyro angle is decreasing/increasing.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: