Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: use retry_interval as retry backoff_max #184

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 11, 2023
Merged

Conversation

padamstx
Copy link
Member

This commit makes a subtle change to the "retry_interval" argument of BaseService.enable_retries().
It is now used to supply the value for the "backoff_max" argument passed to the urllib3's Retry ctor, and now represents the maximum time to wait before the next retry.

This commit makes a subtle change to the "retry_interval"
argument of BaseService.enable_retries().
It is now used to supply the value for the "backoff_max"
argument passed to the urllib3's Retry ctor, and now
represents the maximum time to wait before the next retry.

Signed-off-by: Phil Adams <[email protected]>
@padamstx padamstx self-assigned this Dec 11, 2023
Copy link
Member

@pyrooka pyrooka left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me!

Copy link
Member

@dpopp07 dpopp07 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good!

@padamstx padamstx merged commit 7e84825 into main Dec 11, 2023
4 checks passed
@padamstx padamstx deleted the retry-interval branch December 11, 2023 20:53
ibm-devx-sdk pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 11, 2023
## [3.18.2](v3.18.1...v3.18.2) (2023-12-11)

### Bug Fixes

* use retry_interval as retry backoff_max ([#184](#184)) ([7e84825](7e84825))
@ibm-devx-sdk
Copy link

🎉 This PR is included in version 3.18.2 🎉

The release is available on GitHub release

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants