Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

More insightful reasoning why dulicate Notification was not send representation in Frontend #1015

Open
Wintermute2k6 opened this issue Apr 26, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@Wintermute2k6
Copy link

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

At the moment in IcingaDB-Web there is just a small Point in the Event Tab of the Service History where the Notified Users are Listed which get Notified by a Statechange.
Due to duplicate notification suppression it seems that instead of a reasonable explanation there will be set a None, instead of the correct user which should be notified. Also a addenum like This Notification wasn't send due to duplication would additionally help to get more insight why it wasn't send.

Describe the solution you'd like

It would be great if the User/Group would still be represented which should be notified and a reason why this Message was suppressed. Instead of just setting it to "None"

Describe alternatives you've considered

Maybe this will be already Solved with the new notification handling in the Future but a (probably backport might make sense) for a higher information level in the UX.

Additional context

Sorry for the German Screenshot Information.
image002
image001-2

@Wintermute2k6
Copy link
Author

ref/NC/813228

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant