You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
A couple of customers have reported that the npm config set @infragistics:registry https://packages.infragistics.com/npm/js-licensed/
command is no longer working for them (using npm version 9+).
The command works with a = sign before the link though:
npm config set @infragistics:registry=https://packages.infragistics.com/npm/js-licensed/
The npm config documentation claims to support the npm config set key value syntax in version 9+ for backwards compatibility (link), however, as the customers report, this is not working for them.
Having this in mind, the command snippet should probably be updated?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Right, since 15.1.x is still in active support that means Angular 15 which still supports Node.js 14 https://angular.io/guide/versions#actively-supported-versions, which in turn is the last version that bundled npm 6 https://nodejs.org/en/download/releases.
Unfortunately, npm 6 from what I see was the one using the older API our docs use, so we can't quite replace it just yet. However, we could and probably should add the alternative - something in the lines of "For npm versions 7+" use the updated set call. I'd add we should test that works reliably from 7+ and if not list 8/9+ only.
//2c
A couple of customers have reported that the
npm config set @infragistics:registry https://packages.infragistics.com/npm/js-licensed/
command is no longer working for them (using npm version 9+).
The command works with a
=
sign before the link though:npm config set @infragistics:registry=https://packages.infragistics.com/npm/js-licensed/
The npm config documentation claims to support the
npm config set key value
syntax in version 9+ for backwards compatibility (link), however, as the customers report, this is not working for them.Having this in mind, the command snippet should probably be updated?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: