You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I have been thinking of how we can deal with all the different paths that a project can take when it comes to disputes, refunds etc and have come up with an abstraction.
At the moment we do it all on FundingType however this is very broad and actually is just a setting on how a project is funding.
This new abstraction allows for a bit more fine grained control as you set a config on a per project basis but requires devs to be a little more careful.
It may also allow for a sdk for other developers that want to use the escrow and milestone system, also they could make use of the fellowship for disputes.
I have been thinking of how we can deal with all the different paths that a project can take when it comes to disputes, refunds etc and have come up with an abstraction.
At the moment we do it all on FundingType however this is very broad and actually is just a setting on how a project is funding.
This new abstraction allows for a bit more fine grained control as you set a config on a per project basis but requires devs to be a little more careful.
It may also allow for a sdk for other developers that want to use the escrow and milestone system, also they could make use of the fellowship for disputes.
Any feedback appreciated:
https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=stable&mode=debug&edition=2021&gist=9fd712fef256a43054b21be8dd1d64f1
To be implemented before pallet-dispute.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: