Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Behaviour of valuations under a finite separable extension #203

Open
kbuzzard opened this issue Nov 7, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Behaviour of valuations under a finite separable extension #203

kbuzzard opened this issue Nov 7, 2024 · 2 comments
Assignees

Comments

@kbuzzard
Copy link
Collaborator

kbuzzard commented Nov 7, 2024

For number fields, and I assume in the "AKLB generality" when L/K is a finite separable extension, the following is true. If w is a finite place of L which pulls back to a finite place v of K, and if i:K -> L denotes the inclusion, then for x in K we have w(x)^e=v(x), where e denotes the ramification index of w over v. I had hoped that this would be easy, but ramification index seems to be defined in huge generality and we will need results specific to Dedekind domains in order to prove this. These results are surely already present in some form in mathlib though, given that we have things like sum of e_i * f_i = [L:K].

The goal is to fill in the sorry in the declaration IsDedekindDomain.HeightOneSpectrum.valuation_comap in the file FLT.DededkindDomain.FiniteAdeleRing.BaseChange.

@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this to Unclaimed in FLT Project Nov 7, 2024
@kbuzzard
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@erdOne can you claim this issue by just making a comment with the word claim? You have basically done it.

@erdOne
Copy link
Contributor

erdOne commented Nov 11, 2024

claim

@kbuzzard kbuzzard moved this from Unclaimed to Claimed in FLT Project Nov 11, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: Claimed
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants