Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Grafana Protocol Detail dashboard confusing for nfs throughput #37

Open
mylesuyema opened this issue Jul 25, 2017 · 2 comments
Open

Grafana Protocol Detail dashboard confusing for nfs throughput #37

mylesuyema opened this issue Jul 25, 2017 · 2 comments

Comments

@mylesuyema
Copy link

screen shot 2017-07-25 at 3 35 52 pm

graph labels such as:
read (read) read
read (read) write
lookup (namespace_read) write
lookup (namespace_read) read

@apecoraro
Copy link
Contributor

apecoraro commented Aug 2, 2017

What you are seeing is the name of the operation, followed by the class of the operation, followed by the word "write" if the data is going into the Isilon and the word "read" if the data is coming out of the Isilon.

You can change what that looks like by clicking on the title of the graph and selecting "Edit". Then on the editor screen in the Metrics tab you will see two metric queries, one which queries for the "mean(in_rate)" and one that is for the "mean(out_rate)". If you click the arrow button on the left side of the metric it will drop down and show the Alias by configuration which is currently set to "$tag_op_name ($tag_class_name) write" and "$tag_op_name ($tag_class_name) read" for the in_rate and out_rate respectively. So you can change that to something else to make it less confusing for you.

I'd be interested to know what you think it should be changed to?

@tenortim
Copy link
Collaborator

tenortim commented Nov 6, 2019

I think that "request" and "response" might be clearer labels here, since we're talking protocol operations from the perspective of the server. Does anyone have any additional thoughts?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants