-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[DOCS] difference between REPOSITORY
and ISLANDORA_REPOSITORY
#14
Comments
For your use case, you only have to change |
If you want to use the images in the pull request, you would set So for example: The pull request: Uses the branch: So we can just reference the images produced automatically without the need to build locally: |
OK, if I understand it correctly, "You can easily test a PR on the isle_buildkit repository so long as the PR was made as a feature branch on the Islandora-Devops/isle-buildkit repository, by changing the The elements of documentation which I believe are still missing are: 1 - If I need to make changes to buildkit and want to test that they work locally before making a PR (good practice) how do I do that? Do I really need to push a feature branch to the Islandora-Devlops/isle-buildkit repository? |
There is a way to do this within the isle-buildkit repo: https://github.com/Islandora-Devops/isle-buildkit#running No need to do anything with this site template to test It's worth noting, there is also a Updates to it can be submitted with the pull request you make to
I'm not sure, I fully understand the rest of the question.
This is correct, it's worth noting the
The
There is no default remote docker image repository for the images produced by this repository, as that is the responsibility of the institution that clones this repository. If they choose to set up one at all. |
Closing due to lack of activity. |
I'm trying to test a buildkit PR using the site template. I'm aware that by changing one or both of
REPOSITORY
andISLANDORA REPOSITORY
I can make it use the boxes I just built. The description makes it very hard to tell which one to change.With a little more context and perhaps some examples I think we could improve the .env file's internal documentation.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: