You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I really hope this is not some embarrassing user-side error, but I've got an issue with voxel_metrics(). Depending on whether I use all_voxels=TRUE or all_voxels=FALSE, it returns different results:
Well, I will need the file. I'm sure you have access to a remote storage with your company/university. Or google drive with your google account if you have one. Also if it is a 122 MB las file it will become something like 25-50 MB laz file.
I still do not understand exactly why there was a problem with the join but I fixed it anyway. The output is now correct and I also enhanced the plot function for a better rendering. Thank you for reporting this issue.
Hello,
I really hope this is not some embarrassing user-side error, but I've got an issue with
voxel_metrics()
. Depending on whether I useall_voxels=TRUE
orall_voxels=FALSE
, it returns different results:It also happens when I beforehand exchange the NAs with 0s:
The result using
all_voxels=FALSE
is the right one. I would attach the las-file, but I don't know how to add a 122MB las-file here.Edit: When I don't select the data depending on height, the difference is 301134 vs 43107 rows.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: