support for IOBuffer containing Memory

[longemen3000]

tries to fix #1124

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 75.00000% with 1 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 90.25%. Comparing base (66a3a65) to head (ea8796f).

Files	Patch %	Lines
src/utils.jl	75.00%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1125      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   90.41%   90.25%   -0.17%     
==========================================
  Files           9        9              
  Lines        2305     2308       +3     
==========================================
- Hits         2084     2083       -1     
- Misses        221      225       +4     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[longemen3000]

The good news is that the library prrcompiles on nightly, the bad news is that it fails 😅. I'm gonna check what is wrong

[longemen3000]

@ViralBShah the tests now pass on nightly. the doc errors are due to Documenter 1.0 strict setting. another PR for that is coming.

[ViralBShah]

@oscardssmith Is this good to merge (since you brought this to my attention)?

[oscardssmith]

It looks reasonable to me. The entire getbytebuffer should probably be removed entirely since it's a function who's whole purpose is to violate the IOBuffer abstraction, but within the current framework, this seems like a good fix.

[ViralBShah]

I'll merge for now to fix the breakage elsewhere.

[KristofferC]

Needs a new version for breakage to be fixed.

[quinnj]

I've kicked off a new release