remove 0.5 syntax deprecation warnings #20327
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
+1 to parsing it as a normal call. Fewer special cases will make future macro writers happier. |
ararslan
added
deprecation
|
Commit added for that. |
|
@vtjnash What do you want tests for --- parsing of |
|
Note from triage: tests needed for the new (corrected) meaning of previously-deprecated |
|
mostly just testing for the meaning of type declarations |
JeffBezanson
force-pushed
the
jb/rmsyntaxdeps
branch
from
3798fee
to
d56eef2
Compare
JeffBezanson
force-pushed
the
jb/rmsyntaxdeps
branch
from
d56eef2
to
0352af0
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This handles front-end-related syntax deprecations. A helpful "TODO" reminds us that we now have the option of parsing
=>as a call (like other normal operators) instead of as its own expression head. I could go either way; it's nicer but could break some macros.