You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
accessing a 3D array using 3D indexing is ~3X slower than indexing into a 3D array using 1D (linear) indexing. Please refer to the mailing list discussion here:
Please note that, in the gist, the 1D indices are explicitly computed from the 3D indices. That is, the overhead of converting 3D indices to 1D indices is included in the 1D indexing example.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
accessing a 3D array using 3D indexing is ~3X slower than indexing into a 3D array using 1D (linear) indexing. Please refer to the mailing list discussion here:
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/julia-users/aYS_AvKqPCI/DyTiq4lKIAoJ
and the gist, here:
https://gist.github.com/samtkaplan/5991236
Please note that, in the gist, the 1D indices are explicitly computed from the 3D indices. That is, the overhead of converting 3D indices to 1D indices is included in the 1D indexing example.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: