You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In the generalized eigenvalue problem Ax = λBx where B' = B and B ≥ 0 is makes sense to obtain a Schur decomp with the <x, y> = dot(x, B * y) (semi-)inner product.
Also, some care has to be taken to remove "infinite" eigenvalues: after the shift and invert transformation (A - σB)⁻¹Bx = xθ where θ = 1/(λ - σ) there are x s.t. Bx = 0; transforming back λ = σ + 1/θ would lead to λ = ∞.
Looks like ARPACK uses some daunting looking "purification" process to remove these eigenvalues, but there is also this reference [1] which seems easier.
[1] Meerbergen, Karl, and Alastair Spence. "Implicitly restarted Arnoldi with purification for the shift-invert transformation." Mathematics of Computation of the American Mathematical Society 66.218 (1997): 667-689.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
haampie
changed the title
Matrix-induced (semi-)inner product when B >= 0.
Matrix-induced (semi-)inner product when B ≥ 0.
Aug 2, 2018
Seems like [1] is a lot of words that basically come down to: apply at the end a 0 shift in implicit restart s.t. the new v₁ column is implicitly multiplied by (A - σB)⁻¹B, which filters the components in the null space. Easy enough?
In the generalized eigenvalue problem
Ax = λBx
whereB' = B
andB ≥ 0
is makes sense to obtain a Schur decomp with the<x, y> = dot(x, B * y)
(semi-)inner product.Also, some care has to be taken to remove "infinite" eigenvalues: after the shift and invert transformation
(A - σB)⁻¹Bx = xθ
whereθ = 1/(λ - σ)
there arex
s.t. Bx = 0; transforming backλ = σ + 1/θ
would lead toλ = ∞
.Looks like ARPACK uses some daunting looking "purification" process to remove these eigenvalues, but there is also this reference [1] which seems easier.
[1] Meerbergen, Karl, and Alastair Spence. "Implicitly restarted Arnoldi with purification for the shift-invert transformation." Mathematics of Computation of the American Mathematical Society 66.218 (1997): 667-689.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: