We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
The current versions are very basic and pretty slow compared to LAPACK. They should at a minimum be blocked but we should also consider the methods described in https://books.google.dk/books?hl=en&lr=&id=bx7pAwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA135&dq=Sergey+V+Kuznetsov+bidiagonal&ots=U0trQWuG9j&sig=cGZDU36MrBCKNqRp4V4b1w_55M0&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=Sergey%20V%20Kuznetsov%20bidiagonal&f=false and reference [5]. We might even make them run in parallel and be faster vanilla LAPACK.
The right place to start testing these would be the QR factorization. The idea is the same but the QR is much simpler.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
The current versions are very basic and pretty slow compared to LAPACK. They should at a minimum be blocked but we should also consider the methods described in https://books.google.dk/books?hl=en&lr=&id=bx7pAwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA135&dq=Sergey+V+Kuznetsov+bidiagonal&ots=U0trQWuG9j&sig=cGZDU36MrBCKNqRp4V4b1w_55M0&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=Sergey%20V%20Kuznetsov%20bidiagonal&f=false and reference [5]. We might even make them run in parallel and be faster vanilla LAPACK.
The right place to start testing these would be the QR factorization. The idea is the same but the QR is much simpler.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: