-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 32
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Statement of Need #179
Comments
Hi @ludgerpaehler , @mschauer and I were just discussing this. Most things under "Documentation" in the criteria seem to be about the repository, not the paper. Just to be sure we understand right, would adding this information in the documentation address your concern? |
@cscherrer sorry for the belated reply, yes, absolutely! My concerns were mostly about the docs :) |
#199 now gives context and states the core audience (powering PPL work in Julia behind the scenes) |
Ok to close @ludgerpaehler ? |
Sounds good to me! |
Per Review Criteria
I believe what would really help here is to more clearly establish the rules underlying the definition of a measure in the "Why", hence leading into the definition of a probability measure essentially adding the probability constraint. As is, the "Why" is a little hard to read for someone who does not already know measure theory.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: