Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Client cookie management has possibly poor ergonomics #398

Closed
non-Jedi opened this issue Mar 14, 2019 · 1 comment
Closed

Client cookie management has possibly poor ergonomics #398

non-Jedi opened this issue Mar 14, 2019 · 1 comment

Comments

@non-Jedi
Copy link
Contributor

From a thread on reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/Julia/comments/b0mi6y/is_julia_a_good_general_purpose_programming/eihqisq/

A user gave up on using HTTP.jl for making requests because they had difficulty getting it to do what they want with respect to managing cookies from client requests. Not sure what time period this is from, so things may have improved since then. Maybe this is just a documentation improvement? Full quote below:

I did try, and iirc the documentation focuses on the server.

Single Method actions were easy but managing sessions and updating client cookies got hairy quickly and the documentation didn't deal with that, I found myself trying to make sense of the source code but it is spread across too many modules to grok.

It just wasn't worth the work to get what I had already.

Maybe one day I will return to it, it shouldn't be so hard. I wrote one in shell script!

https://plan9.io/sources/contrib/maht/rc/httplib.rc

@quinnj
Copy link
Member

quinnj commented May 27, 2022

There's not much actionable here, but I apologize for the lack of follow up/response. Many updates have been made since this was originally posted, and this PR (#836) further improves some of the ergonomics. I'm planning a big documentation update soon that will also cover working with cookies.

@quinnj quinnj closed this as completed May 27, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants