You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The FIFO_FWFT implementation is correct in its use of valid+ready handshake signaling clock by clock.
However because of the weird way that the implementation uses its 2 cycle latency BRAM, asserting flow control ready=0 one cycle later causes 2 cycles of pause/valid=0 output data in a way that typical streams of data/FIFOs do not do...
Fix this because it can be a corner case folks get stuck on if not strictly following handshake signals...
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
A similar but not as visible extra latency exists on the write side of the fifo valid in to valid out - running fifo near empty probably doesn't perform exactly as expected duty cycle/rates wise...
Solution is to redo not using the built in dual port fifo prim, but raw VHDL fifo from fifo.h that can have more signals like clock enables that make feedback/buffering through the RAM possible without needing to resort to the current weird implementation with extra buffers.
The FIFO_FWFT implementation is correct in its use of valid+ready handshake signaling clock by clock.
However because of the weird way that the implementation uses its 2 cycle latency BRAM, asserting flow control ready=0 one cycle later causes 2 cycles of pause/valid=0 output data in a way that typical streams of data/FIFOs do not do...
Fix this because it can be a corner case folks get stuck on if not strictly following handshake signals...
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: