Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Allow operator overloading to work with derived FSM implementations #179

Open
JulianKemmerer opened this issue Sep 17, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Allow operator overloading to work with derived FSM implementations #179

JulianKemmerer opened this issue Sep 17, 2023 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@JulianKemmerer
Copy link
Owner

ex. wanting to have a FSM implementing the '+' operator.

right now derived FSMs assume built in operators are always combinatorial logic / not themselves FSMs...

Is complicated since havent parsed types to resolve if a particular '+' is the overloaded FSM version until having decided to parse the code as an FSM to begin with... :-/

Work around for now is to make wrapper functions for your operators...
@JulianKemmerer JulianKemmerer added the enhancement New feature or request label Sep 17, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@JulianKemmerer