You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I have just realized that the VLAN discovery is not working fully -- it does populate VLAN ACLs but not fully in many cases. As one example, the interface on a Cisco 4900M switch is provisioned thusly:
You see that natlas missed VLANs 453, 497, and 628.
I believe I have pinpointed the issue to circumstances where a sequence of VLANs is entered into the ACL with commas, as in:
switchport trunk allowed vlan 452,453
vs using a dash:
switchport trunk allowed vlan 452-453
If a dash is used, natlas seems to pick up on the adjacent VLANs correctly, but if a comma is used to separate adjacent VLANs, it appears to fail, and only captures the first VLAN, from what I can tell.
Is there a way to fix the VLAN processing so that it accepts adjacent allowed VLANs when separated by a comma?
Thank you,
-Seth
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Arapacana
changed the title
allowed VLANs not updating
adjacent allowed VLANs not updating when separated by a comma
Sep 23, 2021
I have just realized that the VLAN discovery is not working fully -- it does populate VLAN ACLs but not fully in many cases. As one example, the interface on a Cisco 4900M switch is provisioned thusly:
The natlas graph for this connection shows:
You see that natlas missed VLANs 453, 497, and 628.
I believe I have pinpointed the issue to circumstances where a sequence of VLANs is entered into the ACL with commas, as in:
switchport trunk allowed vlan 452,453
vs using a dash:
switchport trunk allowed vlan 452-453
If a dash is used, natlas seems to pick up on the adjacent VLANs correctly, but if a comma is used to separate adjacent VLANs, it appears to fail, and only captures the first VLAN, from what I can tell.
Is there a way to fix the VLAN processing so that it accepts adjacent allowed VLANs when separated by a comma?
Thank you,
-Seth
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: