You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is the intention that the version field can be anything? Would it be (technically) valid to write a version of 0xFF and expect that any implementation could correctly parse it, at least at iso6 or higher? Or should the version always be 0x00 or 0x01?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The version should always be 0 or 1 in this case. I raised the same issue some time ago at MPEG. I think we should fix all the syntax to something like:
The group agrees to clarify the syntax. We will decide on the best vehicle to make the changes, possibly in the 8th edition. We also look into clearly specifying a "max version" and clarifying which flags are defined. We welcome concrete text in contributions. We also look into the collaboration with the SDL group.
The syntax for the SampleAuxiliaryInformationOffsetsBox in ISO/IEC 14496-12:2022 has options for the size of the
offset
array that looks like:Is the intention that the
version
field can be anything? Would it be (technically) valid to write a version of0xFF
and expect that any implementation could correctly parse it, at least atiso6
or higher? Or should the version always be0x00
or0x01
?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: