Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(fields): restore DatePicker calendar as body modal #146

Merged

Conversation

ivangabriele
Copy link
Member

@ivangabriele ivangabriele commented Dec 19, 2022

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Dec 19, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #146 (ce2f621) into main (d32d48e) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #146   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   91.37%   91.37%           
=======================================
  Files           9        9           
  Lines          58       58           
  Branches        7        7           
=======================================
  Hits           53       53           
  Misses          5        5           

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

@ivangabriele ivangabriele force-pushed the ivan/fix-fields-restore-datepicker-calendar-as-body-modal branch from 67b5607 to 9349568 Compare December 19, 2022 01:15
@ivangabriele ivangabriele force-pushed the ivan/fix-fields-restore-datepicker-calendar-as-body-modal branch from 9349568 to ce2f621 Compare December 19, 2022 01:21
@ivangabriele ivangabriele merged commit b5f300f into main Dec 19, 2022
@ivangabriele ivangabriele deleted the ivan/fix-fields-restore-datepicker-calendar-as-body-modal branch December 19, 2022 01:25
@ivangabriele
Copy link
Member Author

🎉 This PR is included in version 2.3.1 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants