You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
A validation of RGB++ commitment was added recently, and if a BTC tx without commitment will be ignored even an RGB++ Lock points to it, because it's not an isomorphic binding transaction.
But it introduced an exception that searching for an L1 -> L2 transaction by btc txid doesn't work. L1 -> L2 transaction doesn't require a commitment in the BTC tx, so it's ignored by CKB Explorer.
Here's how to improve:
sync btc txid if it's a L1 -> L2 transaction(RGB++ Lock in inputs but not in outputs)
support searching btc txid of an L1 -> L2 transaction
keep btc txid of an L1 -> L2 invisible on the transaction page
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Sven-TBD
changed the title
Support searching btc tixid which is a L1 -> L2 transaction
Support searching btc txid which is a L1 -> L2 transaction
May 13, 2024
A validation of RGB++ commitment was added recently, and if a BTC tx without commitment will be ignored even an RGB++ Lock points to it, because it's not an isomorphic binding transaction.
But it introduced an exception that searching for an
L1 -> L2
transaction by btc txid doesn't work.L1 -> L2
transaction doesn't require a commitment in the BTC tx, so it's ignored by CKB Explorer.Here's how to improve:
btc txid
if it's aL1 -> L2
transaction(RGB++ Lock in inputs but not in outputs)btc txid
of anL1 -> L2
transactionbtc txid
of anL1 -> L2
invisible on the transaction pageThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: