Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[BUG] Z Max Jerk cannot be set via M205 #16403

Closed
siteswapjuggler opened this issue Dec 31, 2019 · 7 comments
Closed

[BUG] Z Max Jerk cannot be set via M205 #16403

siteswapjuggler opened this issue Dec 31, 2019 · 7 comments

Comments

@siteswapjuggler
Copy link

Bug Description

Unable to set Z jerk within the firmware limitation via M205 command.

My Configurations

A custom CR-10S Pro configuration
myConfiguration.zip

Steps to Reproduce

  1. connect via serial command
  2. send M205 Z0.4

Expected behavior:

Z max jerk behing set

Actual behavior:

Z Max Jerk is not set and I receive "Z Max Jerk limited to 1"

Additional Information

This is whith classic Jerk Mode enable instead of Junction Deviation. A hack was applied by changing the value in the firmware and making a M502 te reset default parameters in the eeprom.

@GMagician
Copy link
Contributor

That's a little weird... warning message is sent only when you have LIMITED_JERK_EDITING enabled, but you don't have it. Again limit is twice DEFAULT_ZJERK then limit 1 means DEFAULT_ZJERK should be 0.5...but you have 0.4.
Now I have my printer busy, I'll try it as soon as it will terminate...

@siteswapjuggler
Copy link
Author

Oh sorry for that I was in the process to refine my config files and I sent you the one where I temporarely get rid of the problem by commenting #LIMITED_JERK_EDITING. My bad

@GMagician
Copy link
Contributor

mmm code is a little bit weird in lkimit check....
LIMIT(val, 1, max_limit[lim_axis]);

jerk seems to be limited between 1 and max...but max is 0.6 when 'LIMITED_JERK_EDITING' is defined...
Need to investigate more

@GMagician
Copy link
Contributor

@siteswapjuggler please try proposed PR..it should fix

@GMagician
Copy link
Contributor

I think you may close this

@siteswapjuggler
Copy link
Author

Sorry I was on another case I forgot to reply. It works perfectly. Thanks a lot.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jul 3, 2020

This issue has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jul 3, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants