Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Feature]: Adding a parameter to customize the DNS server or pass in a custom DOH server address. #4089

Open
sln162 opened this issue Oct 22, 2023 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
feature request feature request priority-low We have considered this issue and decided that we will not be able to address it in the near future. tracked We are tracking this work internally.

Comments

@sln162
Copy link

sln162 commented Oct 22, 2023

Describe the feature/enhancement you need

Edge can change the custom DOH server address by setting it, but WV2 does not support setting and cannot pass parameters to specify the custom DOH server address.
image

Because some of our users' systems or operators' dns are unstable, we hope to customize dns servers, even DOH server addresses.

The scenario/use case where you would use this feature

We have collected information about CoreWebView2WebErrorStatus.HostNameNotResolved through telemetry, and found that some users have indeed encountered this situation. Switching the DNS server on the user's computer resolved the issue, but this requires administrator privileges and requires some modifications to the user's computer. This is not an ideal solution, and the best scenario would be for WV2 to implement this internally.

How important is this request to you?

Nice to have. There are other ways to tackle this, but having official API support would be beneficial.

Suggested implementation

No response

What does your app do? Is there a pending deadline for this request?

No response

AB#47212224

@sln162 sln162 added the feature request feature request label Oct 22, 2023
@victorhuangwq victorhuangwq added the tracked We are tracking this work internally. label Oct 23, 2023
@victorhuangwq
Copy link
Collaborator

We will be tracking this issue internally, but do not that this is no indication of our priority in our backlog

@victorhuangwq victorhuangwq self-assigned this Oct 23, 2023
@victorhuangwq victorhuangwq added the priority-low We have considered this issue and decided that we will not be able to address it in the near future. label Nov 30, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature request feature request priority-low We have considered this issue and decided that we will not be able to address it in the near future. tracked We are tracking this work internally.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants